Need Some Feedback: CM9, CM40, CW40

[Ubaldo99]

I am a Kahr owner, but Im considering another Kahr purchase and would welcome your feedback, fellow KahrTalk members. The 3 pistols I am considering are the CM9, CM40, and CW40. Im leaning toward the 40's because it is a larger caliber. But I really prefer to pocket-carry and the CW40 is just a tiny bit too large (and heavy) for discrete and comfortable pocket-carry. On the other hand, the CW40 is priced about $100 less than the CM9/40's. Hard to overlook that cost advantage. I value the opinions of the members of this Forum and will appreciate any feedback you care to offer. Many thanks in advance. :)

[jocko]

buy the cm9, no offense against the j40 cal but that is a handfull in these smallkahrs, certinly ur gonna hear more jk"complaints" on the 40 cal than the 9's all day long. Course the 40 cal is one powerful cartridge, so expect it. If u can handle the 40 and ur leanig towards it, then u nee dto decide if ur gonna waist band carry or pocket carry. The cm40 will pocket carry the cw40 will not but holds one more round and should give you a better grip also due to the extra length. againsav ing a $100 is nothing to sneeze at. I would think u should beabletofind a cm9 at the same price + or_ 20 bucks as the cw series. kThe cm40 is so new out I have yet to read of anyone owning one. I'm a 9mm fan, so alittle prejudice on my comments. ammo is cheaper in price for sure and I can shoot a 100 rounds out of my PM9 with no pain or discomfort. not sure how one will feel after 100 of 40 cal out of a cm40. again u can always magna port those 40's and have a really pleasant shooter to...