Multiholster IWB for the CM9

[Scarecrow]

I recently ordered a Multi holster IWB for my CM9 and thought I would review it as I like it a lot.
Sorry if it has been reviewed before, but I searched and didn't find any previous threads.
The holster was ordered April 23 and was received on May 19th. It looks very similar to the PJ holster which I've never owned so can't compare. (I just discovered the PJ holster today when searching for previous Multi Holster review threads) Multiholster (.com)
The holster is very high quality, very slim in the waistband, and has adjustable retention via a screw. The belt clip is very strong and I think you would not even need a belt with the clip as it grips that well. Very comfortable to wear, excellent draw, excellent retention and effortless re-holstering for the CM9. This will be my main carry holster from now on. I even rode my bicycle with it and forgot it was there. I would not have believed that a hard plastic holster would be as comfortable as a leather or nylon one.
I had an Uncle Mikes IWB holster (no retention except friction) and have used that till I got this holster. The Uncle Mikes is not secure enough, and I have pulled my S&W 642 out of one by catching it on a shirt and gave it up since then.
The Multiholster is just as comfortable as the softer Uncle Mikes but with great retention and re-holstering. Highly recommended

[Markis82]

It looks very simular to the PJ for $10 more plus $5 shipping and a longer turn around time. The PJ is $45 shipped. So, for $15 less you can get the PJ. Confirms once again, dollar for dollar the PJ cannot be beat. Besides being the best holsters I've ever used.

[Yogi 117]

Scarecrow, nice review. Enjoy the new holster! :israel:

[Scarecrow]

Well, if it is the same as the PJ you can take it as a reccomendation for the PJ as well. This style holster "can't be beat" in my opinion also. The photos of the PJ look exactly like the Multi holster.

[JFootin]

Well, if it is the same as the PJ you can take it as a reccomendation for the PJ as well. This style holster "can't be beat" in my opinion also. The photos of the PJ look exactly like the Multi holster.

Hopefully, Paul, who is so busy making holsters, will chime in here. I think the PJ is made out of thinner kydex, so it wears a little thinner and lighter. Another big difference is that the attachment piece is one piece with the gun on the PJ, whereas it is attached as a seperate piece on the MH. (Now, the tuckable clip attaches at the bottom as a seperate piece on the PJ.)

[pjholster]

I'm not familiar with the Multi Holster, but here are the specs on mine.

For standard IWB, I use .080 kydex with the holster and clip being made from one piece of kydex. I believe that keeps the overall width thinner as opposed to attaching a clip.

For the tuckable holster, I use .060 for the body and .080 for the clip. I do that to keep the holster as thin as possible. Since the body takes very little stress I can go with the thinnest kydex. The .080 is plenty strong and more flexible which helps when clipping it on your belt.

For the OWB belt holsters, I use .093 kydex. I do that because the gun basically hangs off the belt so I feel the extra thickness is warranted to strengthen the holster and give nice solid retention.

If you have any questions feel free to email me at pjholster@gmail.com

Thanks,

Paul

[Tinman507]

Paul,

Keep doing what you're doing. It's working!
Thanks for an outstanding product and customer service.

[Markis82]

Yes, thanks Paul. You are the true holster god! Loving my PJ IWB low ride, straight draw.