View Full Version : purpose of this article?
knkali
09-19-2012, 12:57 PM
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/49088862
so what does this mean? Does it really matter ? Help?
Bawanna
09-19-2012, 01:22 PM
I don't see a single thing worth the time it took to write myself.
I hope they turn him loose myself, his life is over already. Why let the injustice continue and make it even worse.
knkali
09-19-2012, 01:37 PM
sad all the way around. His case is important to the rest of the CCW community. I guess the gun DNA test proves he is not lying when he said he shot before Trevon could grab the gun.
It would be interesting to read a report about CCW holders using DF and what impact that has had on their life afterward. Financially, emotionally, ect. The read could be very sobering.
JohnR
09-19-2012, 02:04 PM
All it means is Martin didn't touch (with bare skin), spit or bleed on the gun. Doesn't prove much of anything.
Just 'cause the news prints it doesn't mean it's news.
getsome
09-19-2012, 02:15 PM
Consider the source of the article....
muggsy
09-19-2012, 02:50 PM
A big ado about nothing.
All it means is Martin didn't touch (with bare skin), spit or bleed on the gun. Doesn't prove much of anything.
Just 'cause the news prints it doesn't mean it's news.
That is interesting, because if Zimmerman was lying on the ground with Martin beating his head into the pavement while he pulled the gun and shot Martin no blood ended up on the weapon at such a close range. I would think that Martin would be shot and then possibly fall onto the gun or there would be blood spray. I am not CSI, and cannot say that it is impossible, but if it is being put forth as evidence in this case they are probably going to lead into the ideal that it isn't. Being that they have the burden of proof, hopefully they will back it up with science.
Bawanna
09-19-2012, 03:43 PM
This is a race case. He looked just like Obummers son if he was man enough to have one. The rules and burden of proof? none of that applies.
I hate myself for my anti liberal attitude sometimes but there's no off switch for excellent profiling.
jocko
09-19-2012, 04:10 PM
which son, the photo of when he was 10 or the photo of when he was 17. ??? lots of scenario;'s gonna be presented by the persecutors, as that is all they have. Trevon is DOA, he can't tell his story, thgat is a big plus for zimmerman. Florida lawis also on zimmermans side, now if u get an all black jury (which will never happen)_ then they will hang him 30 inutes before trial, but ay white partial jury wll be a different story. Takes 12. I just don't see that happening...... they dhn't want this to go to trial before election as it will steal obummers thunder, plus when the black riot after the verdict, then again it will hurt obummers chances... Just sayi.
knkali
09-19-2012, 04:36 PM
This is a race case. He looked just like Obummers son if he was man enough to have one. The rules and burden of proof? none of that applies.
I hate myself for my anti liberal attitude sometimes but there's no off switch for excellent profiling.
Bawanna, I am not following you. Can you explain your position a little more? Seriously, I dont get what you mean about profiling and rules/burden of proof. I know I am a cement head and need pictures but please expand your comment if you can.
Bawanna
09-19-2012, 04:52 PM
I'll try. The local police had no intention of even filing charges against Zimmerman. White on white wouldn't have made the 6th page of local paper let alone national TV coverage.
It was only when Jesse and Al and their bunch threw a fit that the federals got involved.
Now it's turned into a 3 ring circus with the focus being on whats gonna happen given each verdict scenario. Either way guilty or innocent (doesn't really matter) things are going to get ugly. So they are undoubtedly trying to determine which verdict would be less ugly, regardless of guilt or innocence.
The trial if legit should have been done in 2 days max. But to get some screen time for the major players and yes even screen time for the incumbent in the white house (it is an election year) it gets drug on and on.
We of course really have no clue what happened other than what the media said and we've chewed that bone enough when it first came out. But as Jocko pointed out, what good did it do for the media to show pictures of a 10 year old Travone looking like a model student when in reality he's a 17 year old with his drawers at his knees and looking typically dirtbag gangster.
This is of course not to say that all dirtbag gangster that wear their drawers at their knees are inherently bad people, just 97 % or so.
knkali
09-19-2012, 05:30 PM
OK got it crystal clear now. Thanks.
Tinman507
09-19-2012, 05:32 PM
http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20091114235939/uncyclopedia/images/9/9f/Worm_on_hook.gif
jocko
09-19-2012, 06:30 PM
I'll try. The local police had no intention of even filing charges against Zimmerman. White on white wouldn't have made the 6th page of local paper let alone national TV coverage.
It was only when Jesse and Al and their bunch threw a fit that the federals got involved.
Now it's turned into a 3 ring circus with the focus being on whats gonna happen given each verdict scenario. Either way guilty or innocent (doesn't really matter) things are going to get ugly. So they are undoubtedly trying to determine which verdict would be less ugly, regardless of guilt or innocence.
The trial if legit should have been done in 2 days max. But to get some screen time for the major players and yes even screen time for the incumbent in the white house (it is an election year) it gets drug on and on.
We of course really have no clue what happened other than what the media said and we've chewed that bone enough when it first came out. But as Jocko pointed out, what good did it do for the media to show pictures of a 10 year old Travone looking like a model student when in reality he's a 17 year old with his drawers at his knees and looking typically dirtbag gangster.
This is of course not to say that all dirtbag gangster that wear their drawers at their knees are inherently bad people, just 97 % or so.
Mr. Bawanna. everything u said made perfect sense, so therefore I have come to the conclusion that you didn't write this stuff but had help:der:
Bawanna
09-19-2012, 06:33 PM
I'm thinking of temporarily banning myself. Its easy to label me a racist which I absolutely am not. I'm just an excellent profiler which is of course also not politically correct. But that is another thing that is dragging the country down the drain. Political correctness.
How long do you think I should ban myself for?
Alfonse
09-19-2012, 06:45 PM
It's probably already been long enough.
Tinman507
09-19-2012, 06:46 PM
Aren't you afraid of going blind if you ban yourself?
Bawanna
09-19-2012, 06:49 PM
I guess there is that to ponder. Everything else is going to seed, hate to see the eyes go too.
Think I'd go blind in like 2 weeks? That would be a major punishment.
Probably need counseling to get thru something like that.
jocko
09-19-2012, 06:53 PM
we would miss u. I tink!! Just sayin.
"In free countries, every man is entitled to express his opinions and every other man is entitled not to listen." -G. Norman Collie
knkali
09-19-2012, 10:50 PM
Bawanna teaches profiling to profilers. He knows his stuff. I send him pix of perps and he can tell me what they eat for breakfast, their whole life story. Not many have that skill. You are born with it.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.