PDA

View Full Version : P938 'Extreme' First Impressions & Initial Range Report



OlympicFox
11-17-2012, 12:43 AM
I picked up my new Sig P238 'Extreme' yesterday. This is my take on this nifty Nine.

Features common to all Sig P938's:


Stainless steel slide on aluminum alloy frame
9mm Luger
SAO with ambi thumb safety
Night sights - large & useful
Front & rear cocking serrations on slide combined with a fairly light recoil spring makes for easy slide racking - my wife finds it quite easy, even when the hammer is down
Flatwire recoil spring on solid stainless guide rod
Removable grips

The 'Extreme' model includes three features:



An extended 7-round magazine as well as a standard 6-round magazine
Black Nitron stainless slide over black anodized aluminum frame with black controls
G10 grips with an aggressive texture

Dimensions. Since many of the small pistol manufacturs use creative ways to quote their dimensions, I've measured both the Sig P938 & the Kahr PM9 several ways: (Kahr PM9)
Length: 5.9" (5.5)
Height: 4.0" with std mag, 4.5" with ext mag (4.2, 4.9)
Width:
@ Grips 0.93" (0.93)
@ Slide 0.88" (0.90)
@ Ambi safeties 1.17" (1.11 @ slide stop)
Weight: (Kahr PM9)

Gun only: 15.7 oz (15.0)
with 7-rd magazine: 17.5 oz (16.5)
Loaded: 21.6 oz (20.0)
So, as you can see the little Sig is within a whisker of being as small and light as the longtime standard bearer, the Kahr PM9. Frankly, I'm impressed considering the Sig has a metal frame and a beavertail.


About carrying "cocked and locked" (Condition One):
Some folks are bothered by this. Count me among those for quite a while (years). I carried a 1911 for over 20 years in Uncle's service, however we always carried it in Condition Three: Chamber empty, full magazine in place, hammer down. The plan was to draw, quickly rack the slide and then shoot if the SHTF. Well, not only is that slow, too slow, one of the guys in my unit shot his partner in the knee doing exactly that. Seems that there's a strong tendency to put the finger on the trigger under those circumstances, which results in BANG as soon as the round is chambered and the slide is back in battery regardless of where the gun is pointed during the slide racking drill. :eek:


Then, we got issued the M92 Beretta. At first, I thought it was lunacy to carry with a round chambered and no safety engaged. After a brief time, I got used to the idea of a DA/SA pistol and came to like it - a lot.



Back to the 1911. I started shooting 1911's in IDPA a while back. At first, it was a bit spooky. I was still nervous about cocked and locked and sometimes I even carried both the 1911 and my Sig P238 in Condition 3. But, after a few months of shooting 2K rounds a month from the holster, I got over those concerns as well as getting quite proficient with the 1911 battery of arms. Getting that safety on/off is well ingrained in my muscle memory now.
First impressions out of the box:


Like most Sigs, the P938 just feels good in the hand.
The trigger guard is nicely undercut to give a full 2-finger grip with the standard mag while the PM9 has a 1.9 finger grip. That changes to a very comfortable full grip with 7-round magazine. The extended mag looks like a work of art compared to the dorky looking Kahr extended mag. The 7-round magazine also gives the gun a nice round butt which is not only comfortable, it facilitates drawing from a pocket.
The checkering on the front strap is the best I've seen on any Sig, including my P226 Elite's and X-Five. Like a high-end 1911, the checkering is aggressive without being painful.
The trigger pull is short . . . and on the heavy side. Factory specs are 7.5-8.5#. I measured a pull of 6.91# (average of 20 on my Lyman gauge). Then I measured my Kahr PM9 this evening at 7.05#, so the P938's pull is actually less than the PM9's. That said, the Kahr's trigger is silky smooth compared to the little Sig, but the Sig's trigger will get smoother with use while the Kahr's will unlikely change much with wear.
The slide is amazingly easy to rack for such a small pistol rated for +P.
The G10 grips on the 'Extreme' model are fairly aggressive. Great for holding the gun, but too aggressive for CCW against bare skin under a shirt. While not normally fond of the 'Extreme' look, the grips do soften the outline of the gun making it possibly more difficult to 'make' should it become exposed briefly.
FYI, the Owner's Manual lists an all stainless version @ 21.7 oz with magazine. :)



A Brief Range Report: I took the P938 to the Sunnydell Shooting Grounds, owned by an Olympic Champion skeet shooter. Naturally, it's all about shotguns, but they have one lane inside a culvert for pistols. A little bizarre - and loud - but it's close. I ran 50 rounds of Federal Champion 115gr FMJ straight out of the box followed by a magazine of Winchester Ranger-T 147gr.



No failures to feed, eject or fire.
The magazine did drop prematurely early on, but I believe my thumb hit the mag release.
The recoil is definitely snappy, especially with the faster 115 gr load. It felt very similar to my PM9.
Double taps would be a real challenge for the average shooter. Any day that I feel like the ability to do a Double Tap is a priority is a day I carry a 1911.
The gun never felt "loose" in my hand like my PM9 does. In other words, while the recoil was lively, it never felt like I wasn't gripping the gun firmly enough. I can't quite say the same for my PM9 and there's a reason why my PM40 is covered with grip tape!
Just like on my P238, the extended mag on the P938 doesn't pinch the little finger the way Pearce grip mag extensions do.
Accuracy? I wore the wrong glasses to the range today, so front sight was a total blur. Maybe next time with my shooting glasses.

The Future:


Continue breaking in the P938 with a variety of FMJ and most of my 12+ different types of JHP. As always, I'll run all of my defensive ammo through the chrono before making the final decision on what loads to carry.
Two holsters are on order:

IWB: TTGunleather Mike's Special
OWB: Fist #7 pancake with dropped front, extreme cant and Kydex lining


Smooth Cocobolo grips are on order
An extended single-side thumb safety, just like my 1911's is also on order. The OEM thumb safety is a bit small to work quickly/easily. And I don't like ambi safeties on carry guns because they make it too easy to unintentionally disengage the safety.
As soon as the thumb safety arrives, it's off to the Sig Armorer for a 5# trigger job and installation of the extended thumb safety.

Bottom Line? It's a keeper.
:33:




http://serenitysys.com/shooting/guns/Sig_P938/Sig_P938-6351_800.jpg

Sig P938 "Extreme"

http://serenitysys.com/shooting/guns/Sig_P938/Sig_P938-6354_800.jpg

http://serenitysys.com/shooting/guns/Sig_P938/Sig_P938-6352_800.jpg

Left to right: Sig P238 "Rosewood", Sig P938 "Extreme" Who knew the cost of carrying a 'Nine' would be so little more that carrying a 380?

http://serenitysys.com/shooting/guns/Sig_P938/Sig_P938-6353_800.jpg


Left to right: Kahr PM40 with CT and lots of grip tape, Sig P938 "Extreme"

http://serenitysys.com/shooting/guns/Sig_P938/Sig_P938-6355_800.jpg


Left to right: Sig P938 "Extreme", Dan Wesson "Guardian". A Commander-size 1911 with a 4.25" barrel; also in 9mm.

JFootin
11-17-2012, 06:57 AM
That is an excellent report, OF. Makes me think seriously about trading my CM9.

OlympicFox
11-17-2012, 10:40 AM
Thanks.

The wife bought a CM9 a while back, then sold it to a friend who later traded it back for one of her J-frames - so the CM9 is back in the safe. Next to the PM9 that's also for sale.

Maybe I'm a snob, or maybe I just like good stuff but I prefer the PM9 over the CM9 just because the slide is finished so much nicer. That, and I like my carry guns black because a small black gun isn't as readily noticeable if the cover garment fails to cover for a moment. And I like night sights in my defensive guns. Details matter and the fact of life is that details cost money.

So, the Sig P938 wins hands down over the CM9 in my book. The PM9 comes much closer in practical terms, but it's still lacking in three significant areas:


Full 3-finger grip
Ease of racking the slide - a major issue for many of the gals
Aesthetics

The Kahr's major advantage is a simpler battery of arms. Fortunately, training can reduce that advantage to insignificant.


That is an excellent report, OF. Makes me think seriously about trading my CM9.

bonjorno2
11-17-2012, 11:22 AM
I like my 938, but still carry the cm9 more than it due to the safety. I prefer a dao pistol for sd, and until I get that plastic trigger out of the sig I won't carry it.

JFootin
11-17-2012, 01:54 PM
Maybe I'm a snob, or maybe I just like good stuff but I prefer the PM9 over the CM9 just because the slide is finished so much nicer.

Oh, I dunno. I think my CM9 looks passable. :D

View my SLIDESHOW (http://s1230.photobucket.com/albums/ee486/John_England/My%20Custom%20CM9/?albumview=slideshow).

OlympicFox
11-17-2012, 09:00 PM
I know what you mean about a DAO for self defense. Personally, I prefer a good DA/SA like a Sig. In fact, our home defense guns are Sig P226's and S&W 686's. All with Custom Shop/Performance Center triggers so the actions are lighter & smoother than production, yet still factory.

my primary home defense pistol is a Sig P226 Elite Stainless in 40. Their Custom Shop gave it a very smooth 7.6# DA pull followed by a 3.6# SA pull with a short reset. Pretty much perfect for a defensive trigger. But, at 43.0 ounces empty and 55.5 ounces fully loaded, it's tank.

Unfortunately, the P239 is Sig's smallest & lightest DA/SA. The P239 SAS Gen 2 keeps popping up on my wish list, but it's comparable to my Commander 1911 in size and weight. I'm seriously considering it, but . . . Either way, the 1911 and the P239 are like two sizes larger and heavier than the CM9/P938 class - more than I like to carry regularly.

I had a S&W 3913NL with a DA/SA trigger. While it was lighter and thinner than the Sig, the trigger was among the worst I've owned, plus it was a PITA to clean. We still have the wife's 3913LS, though.

Since I'm not willing to carry a heavy service gun regularly, I have to make compromises and the trigger is one of those compromises. Three of my CCW guns are Kahrs and two are 1911's (including the pseudo 1911 P938). Since I shoot a custom 1911 with a 3# trigger regularly, as well as two competition M&P's with 3.1# triggers, I'm pretty comfortable with ability to handle a 4-5# SAO safely when the SHTF.

OTOH, I "discourage" my wife from carrying either of her 1911's or the Sig P238/P938 until she practices enough. She really likes both of her 1911's so this is a good incentive to get her to practice more. In the mean time, her CCW choices are the S&W 3913LS, Sig P232SS and her 2.5" S&W 686 357 Magnum at home - all DA/SA guns.



I like my 938, but still carry the cm9 more than it due to the safety. I prefer a dao pistol for sd, and until I get that plastic trigger out of the sig I won't carry it.

I didn't mean to imply that the CM9 is an ugly gun - Glock has a patent on that. :D I simply meant that the PM9 is more aesthetically pleasing because of the nicer machine work on the slide.



Oh, I dunno. I think my CM9 looks passable. :D

View my SLIDESHOW (http://s1230.photobucket.com/albums/ee486/John_England/My%20Custom%20CM9/?albumview=slideshow).

JFootin
11-17-2012, 10:10 PM
I didn't mean to imply that the CM9 is an ugly gun - Glock has a patent on that. :D I simply meant that the PM9 is more aesthetically pleasing because of the nicer machine work on the slide.

I know. I was just taking the opportunity to show off my custom mirror polished CM9, and to point out that the mirror polishing looks better on the uninterrupted facets of the CM9 slide than it would on the machined lines of the PM9 slide. :hippie:

OlympicFox
11-17-2012, 10:25 PM
That makes sense, but where are the pix????

I didn't like the half-arsed polish/brush job on my Springfield, so I polished the slide with 800 W&D paper and sanded the rough edges with my orbital sander (poor man's melt). It gets 10X as much attention at matches as my Nighthawks that cost twice as much.

http://serenitysys.com/shooting/guns/SA1911/SA_1911_Trophy_Match_WM-5624.jpg

http://serenitysys.com/shooting/guns/SA1911/SA_TM-6078_1024.jpg


http://serenitysys.com/shooting/guns/SA1911/Springfield_TM_polished-6091_www.jpg




I know. I was just taking the opportunity to show off my custom mirror polished CM9, and to point out that the mirror polishing looks better on the uninterrupted facets of the CM9 slide than it would on the machined lines of the PM9 slide. :hippie:

muggsy
11-18-2012, 07:04 AM
Anytime you copy a John Moses Browning design you can't go far wrong.

JFootin
11-18-2012, 08:31 AM
That makes sense, but where are the pix????

That Trophy Match is beautiful! :)

Did you not click the link to my SLIDESHOW (http://s1230.photobucket.com/albums/ee486/John_England/My%20Custom%20CM9/?albumview=slideshow)? Here is one pic from it...

http://i1230.photobucket.com/albums/ee486/John_England/My%20Custom%20CM9/KahrCM9PolishedLSwMagandBullets.jpg

gb6491
11-18-2012, 09:02 AM
OlympicFox,
Nice review, thanks for taking the time to put it together:)
I've considered purchasing a P938, but the three I've handled had atrocious triggers. Personally, I doubt any of those would improve enough through use to be acceptable to me. Please post if you see significant improvement in your 938's trigger as you get more rounds down range with it or let us know how the trigger job goes.

Originally Posted by OlympicFox http://kahrtalk.com/images/tigra/buttons/viewpost.gif (http://kahrtalk.com/showthread.php?p=199182#post199182)
Maybe I'm a snob, or maybe I just like good stuff but I prefer the PM9 over the CM9 just because the slide is finished so much nicer. That, and I like my carry guns black because a small black gun isn't as readily noticeable if the cover garment fails to cover for a moment. And I like night sights in my defensive guns. Details matter and the fact of life is that details cost money. FWIW,, there are night sights available for the CM9.
Regards,
Greg

melissa5
11-18-2012, 09:11 AM
Greg, I don't remember if I posted this in my P938 thread, but changing to a reduced power mainspring will take the trigger pull down to around 4-5 lbs. I haven't measured the pull, but is a big improvement. There's a thread on the Sig forum about doing this.

Replaced the main spring with a Wolff Reduced Power 20lb spring for a Colt Mustang ($4.19)
http://www.midwayusa.com/product/376...-reduced-power

gb6491
11-18-2012, 11:04 AM
Greg, I don't remember if I posted this in my P938 thread, but changing to a reduced power mainspring will take the trigger pull down to around 4-5 lbs. I haven't measured the pull, but is a big improvement. There's a thread on the Sig forum about doing this.

Replaced the main spring with a Wolff Reduced Power 20lb spring for a Colt Mustang ($4.19)
http://www.midwayusa.com/product/376...-reduced-power
Thanks Melissa!:) I'll check that out.http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys/smiley-computer004.gif (http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys.php)
Regards,
Greg

OlympicFox
11-18-2012, 04:57 PM
Now THAT is an outstanding looking CM9!!!! I can see why you like its looks over the PM9.

One of the issues I have with polishing semi-autos is taking the edges off the cocking serrations on the slide. So, when I polished my Trophy Match, I put a piece of 800 or 1200 (can't remember) wet'n'dry on a piece of glass, and ran the slide forwards and backwards only. I didn't intend on polishing it to the high shine of your CM9, so I wanted any remaining marks to be horizontal. Then, I briefly buffed it with a wheel & Flitz.

I used this gun in Regional IDPA match in CA this June. Every Safety Officer noticed it and commented on it. The Ed Brown bobtail helps set it off.

OTOH, my workhorse PM40 looks positively fugly!

http://serenitysys.com/shooting/guns/Kahr_PM40_IMG_3217.jpg


That Trophy Match is beautiful! :)

Did you not click the link to my SLIDESHOW (http://s1230.photobucket.com/albums/ee486/John_England/My%20Custom%20CM9/?albumview=slideshow)? Here is one pic from it...

http://i1230.photobucket.com/albums/ee486/John_England/My%20Custom%20CM9/KahrCM9PolishedLSwMagandBullets.jpg

OlympicFox
11-18-2012, 05:09 PM
Thanks for the reminder. I'll have to try that in my P238 & P938. But, I'll want to thoroughly test it with my carry ammo and carefully inspect the spent brass for light strikes. I tried RP hammer springs in my Sig P226 and had big issues igniting CCI primers. OTOH, it worked wonders on the P6.


Greg, I don't remember if I posted this in my P938 thread, but changing to a reduced power mainspring will take the trigger pull down to around 4-5 lbs. I haven't measured the pull, but is a big improvement. There's a thread on the Sig forum about doing this.

Replaced the main spring with a Wolff Reduced Power 20lb spring for a Colt Mustang ($4.19)
http://www.midwayusa.com/product/376...-reduced-power

OlympicFox
11-18-2012, 05:41 PM
I couldn't help but notice that the trigger on the several P938's I've handled were atrocious too. My P238 isn't much different. But, I really liked almost everything else about the gun & my hunch was/is that I'll be able to run it slightly better/faster than I can run the PM9.

I just ordered the 20# mainsprings (the P238 too!) that Melissa noted, so I'll test them with those before shipping the gun off for the trigger job. It should make for a nice comparison between the cheap mainspring swap and the full trigger job.

In the mean time, I put a few more rounds downrange today between stages in the IDPA match. Today it was 124 gr Federal American Eagle FMJ and some of my soft shooting 170 gr moly-lead IDPA load. Once again, it ran perfectly. Had a friend try it - he thought it was a bit snappy, so I handed him my PM40 full of 165 gr Ranger-T. :hurt:

We reset his snappy meter. :D


OlympicFox,
Nice review, thanks for taking the time to put it together:)
I've considered purchasing a P938, but the three I've handled had atrocious triggers. Personally, I doubt any of those would improve enough through use to be acceptable to me. Please post if you see significant improvement in your 938's trigger as you get more rounds down range with it or let us know how the trigger job goes.
FWIW,, there are night sights available for the CM9.
Regards,
Greg

JFootin
11-18-2012, 05:56 PM
I bought the gun already polished. You're right, it is very hard to grip the slide serrations and rack the slide.

PattayaPistol
11-18-2012, 06:20 PM
OlymicFox,

I am probably one of a very small minority here, but although I can see the beauty in JFootin's CM9, I would not want to own it. To me your workhorse PM40 is far from fugly and looks exactly like a no nonsense gun should look, and I would like that.

As far as Sigs are concerned, I am not really a fan. I had a chance to pick up a 226 but honestly after shooting it a week, couldn't warm up to it (a family member had borrowed money from me, left me the gun as collateral and asked me to shoot it and see if I wanted it). Now, if H&K ever made a pocket gun I'd be all over that, but the likelihood of that happening is next to zip.

Enjoy your guns.
PP

OlympicFox
11-18-2012, 06:59 PM
I'm not so sure you're in a minority. In fact, I've actually considered having that polished Springfield Trophy Match Ceracoted & converting it from a target pistol into a CCW pistol. And I've got a new 1911 on order that every week I re-think whether to go brushed stainless or black. Maybe black with ivory grips for dress occasions. :2eek:

Fortunately, we have lots of choices when we're in the market for a new gun. I love having all those choices, while it sort of drives my wife crazy. I like pretty much everything about Sig P226's. Which may explain why we've owned almost as many Sig's as 1911's. The one gripe I have is that my thumb slides on the takedown lever during recoil and that sometimes annoys me. I've handled a few H&K's and I'll admit that they feel better than good in the hand. If they offered a single stack, I may well have bought one instead of the P938.

I prefer my CCW guns in black, too. While not necessarily better looking, black is simply less noticeable if the gun gets uncovered. Even though open carry is legal where we live, I prefer to avoid upsetting the wimps that are afraid of guns and inciting them to become pro-active anti-gunners.

As for my competition guns? I prefer pretty. Hard chromed, Ceracoted, polished stainless, spiffy grips. Anything but fugly.

None the less, the PM40 is fugly and that's not intended to be a compliment. OTOH, my Dan Wesson Guardian is a looker . . .

http://serenitysys.com/shooting/guns/Dan_Wesson/DW_Guardian-6249_1024.jpg

The finish on the Dan Wesson is so smooth and a lustrous black instead of fugly black. It wears a pair of matte walnut burl grips when more discretion is in order.




OlymicFox,

I am probably one of a very small minority here, but although I can see the beauty in JFootin's CM9, I would not want to own it. To me your workhorse PM40 is far from fugly and looks exactly like a no nonsense gun should look, and I would like that.

As far as Sigs are concerned, I am not really a fan. I had a chance to pick up a 226 but honestly after shooting it a week, couldn't warm up to it (a family member had borrowed money from me, left me the gun as collateral and asked me to shoot it and see if I wanted it). Now, if H&K ever made a pocket gun I'd be all over that, but the likelihood of that happening is next to zip.

Enjoy your guns.
PP

OlympicFox
11-18-2012, 08:54 PM
Grip tape, like duct tape, solves all kinds of problems. Not exactly elegant, but effective.

http://serenitysys.com/shooting/guns/Kahr_CM9_IMG_3437.jpg


I even found some clear grip tape that's less fugly. OK, not much less.

http://serenitysys.com/shooting/guns/Sig_p232/Sig_P232_griptape_IMG_3541.jpg



I bought the gun already polished. You're right, it is very hard to grip the slide serrations and rack the slide.

JFootin
11-18-2012, 09:54 PM
I just couldn't fugly my shiny beauty up like that. I don't have a pic, but I added thin, carefully cut strips of Traction Grip material in the serrations, which looks kinda cool, but it didn't really help gripping the slide. I find that when the gun and I are warmed up from shooting at the range, I can rack the slide just fine if I need to clear a jam. (Only had 1 or 2 jams during breakin and none since.) I keep hoping the recoil spring will loosen some more.

Hey PP, mine is a fine gentleman's firearm! LOL! :cool:

OlympicFox
11-18-2012, 10:15 PM
I thought about sending the slide to one of the custom shops and having them do a fish scale treatment to the P232 slide, but she says no. So, I offered to buy her a plain two-tone P232, swap slides, sell the plain P232, then polish the slide the same way I did on my Springfield. She still says no.

This photo shows how the serrations on the Springfield are even sharper than before. She's not keen on racking the slide on a 45, but this one is effortless for her because there's just no slipping.

http://serenitysys.com/shooting/guns/SA1911/SA_cocking_serrations_DSC_6098.jpg



I just couldn't fugly my shiny beauty up like that. I don't have a pic, but I added thin, carefully cut strips of Traction Grip material in the serrations, which looks kinda cool, but it didn't really help gripping the slide. I find that when the gun and I are warmed up from shooting at the range, I can rack the slide just fine if I need to clear a jam. (Only had 1 or 2 jams during breakin and none since.) I keep hoping the recoil spring will loosen some more.

Hey PP, mine is a fine gentleman's firearm! LOL! :cool: