MK9 vs. PM9

[SRT2]

Other than weight, how much difference is there
in size between the PM9 and the MK9?

Thanks

[jocko]

almost the same. not enough to argue about IMO. Avery nice gun the MK. if ur a steel person.

[berettabone]

NADA....................8 ozs. in weight...................

[b4uqzme]

It's like the bizarro world. Exactly the same but opposite.

[phil413tx]

Of course the main difference is shooting them. My MK9 is still one of my favorite guns. The PM9 is a great shooter but not as much fun as the MK. Size is pretty much the same.

[mser]

I've carried my PM9 since November 2002. It's been flawless in performance and reliability. After recently obtaining a pre-owned (?) K9 that I'm thrilled with, thoughts have been entering my mind about moving to the MK9. Am I nuts? :crazy:

[jocko]

only u would know that, they are located betwween ur legs behind ur pecker..

[RevRay]

I've carried my PM9 since November 2002. It's been flawless in performance and reliability. After recently obtaining a pre-owned (?) K9 that I'm thrilled with, thoughts have been entering my mind about moving to the MK9. Am I nuts? :crazy:

No, you're not nuts at all. I like the looks, the feel in my hand & when shooting, and I especially like the balance of my MK9 ... and my shot groups are tighter.

[O'Dell]

I've carried my PM9 since November 2002. It's been flawless in performance and reliability. After recently obtaining a pre-owned (?) K9 that I'm thrilled with, thoughts have been entering my mind about moving to the MK9. Am I nuts? :crazy:

Not an MK9 but my MK40 and PM9. Same range - same distance. You tell me which is the better shooter. I think the MK is better looking too. Still holding out for an MK45.