PDA

View Full Version : Hey Connecticut, the gun Police are calling....



downtownv
12-06-2013, 01:20 PM
CT forced registration of so-called assault weapons approaching deadline
By New Haven Register (CT) December 6, 2013 12:20 pm
Print Tell a Friend Text Size: A A A
Connecticut residents who own guns categorized as assault weapons under firearm regulations have until the end of the month to register the weapons with the state before risking felony charges in some cases.

The registration requirement was included in gun control regulations approved in April as part of a state response to the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings. The law expanded the number of firearms prohibited in Connecticut and banned the sale of ammunition magazines that carry more than 10 rounds.

Although the law did not require gun owners who had previously purchased the weapons and magazines to get rid of them, it did require them to register the equipment with the state. The deadline for declaring the guns and high capacity magazines is Jan. 1.

As of mid-November, the state had received about 4,100 applications for assault weapon certificates and about 2,900 declarations of large-capacity magazines.

Michael Lawlor, Gov. Dannel P. Malloy's criminal justice adviser, said fewer people than expected have registered weapons under the new lawso far. However, he said gun owners should take seriously the consequences of ignoring the law. Disregarding the registration requirements can carry felony charges in some cases, which can make Connecticut residents ineligible to own guns.

First-time offenders who can prove they owned the weapon before the law passed, and have otherwise followed the law, may be charged with a class A misdemeanor. In other cases, possessing one of the newly-banned guns will be considered a felony that carries with it a sentence of at least a year in prison.

"If you haven't declared it or registered it and you get caught ... you'll be a felon. People who disregard the law are, among other things, jeopardizing their right to own firearms. If you're not a law-abiding citizen, you're not a law-abiding citizen," Lawlor said.

Scott Wilson, president of the Connecticut Citizens Defense League, said he believes there are a number of gun owners in the state who have yet to register their weapons. Wilson counts himself among that number, although he said he plans to declare his rifle before Jan. 1. The CCDL is a Second Amendment advocacy group opposed to the new law.

Wilson said many Connecticut gun owners were holding off on registering their weapons while a lawsuit filed by his group makes its way through the court system. The complaint challenged the constitutionality of the new law and asked a judge to bar its implementation.

"I have a hunch that there's at least 4,000 more (unregistered weapons.)" Wilson said. "I think a lot of our members were hoping there would be injunctive relief before the year's end."

Although the lawsuit is still pending, the court has not ordered an injunction and CCDL is advising its members to register their weapons and magazines before the deadline.

Wilson said there is grumbling about the requirement among Connecticut gun owners. Many of them fundamentally oppose the idea of declaring the firearms to the state. He said he agrees with their position, but does not want to see anyone become a felon for not following the new law.

"We're law-abiding citizens. CCDL is law-abiding. Until we can get this law changed, we feel it's in our best interest to register. I understand the mindset (of those who chose not register). It runs contrary to pretty much everything I believe in," he said. "I've dragged my feet. It doesn't feel right to me but I'm going to do it."

Wilson said gun owners looking for help complying with the law could visit his group's website at www.ccdl.us.

The new law added about 100 guns to a list of weapons specifically banned in Connecticut and broadened a "physical characteristic test" of military-style features that make it an assault weapon. The expanded definition of assault weapon includes the AR-15 style weapon the gunman in Newtown used to murder 26 people.The law includes an exemption for military service members who move to the state after the deadline. They have 90 days to apply for a certificate to keep the gun. Everyone else who moves to the state has a 90-day period to permanently disable it, sell it to a gun dealer, or move it out of Connecticut.

This story has been modified from its original version. See the original at ctnewsjunkie.com.

Bawanna
12-06-2013, 01:40 PM
:popcorn::popcorn::popcorn:

ltxi
12-06-2013, 04:06 PM
:popcorn::popcorn::popcorn:

yeah

VN Vet
12-06-2013, 05:07 PM
I hate this for the good people of Connecticut.

I hate the "one bad apple spoils the barrel" kind of person.

I hate hating so I try to find something good in everyone and everything. I hate it when I can't find anything good.

ltxi
12-06-2013, 05:25 PM
I hate this for the good people of Connecticut.

I hate the "one bad apple spoils the barrel" kind of person.

I hate hating so I try to find something good in everyone and everything. I hate it when I can't find anything good.

Well...I've learned to hate looking too hard for the good because it always comes to no good and then I hate that I'm hating. So, I think we're in complete opposite agreement.

Besides....back when, trying to love everyone cost me three wives.

That aside.....voters often get what they deserve.

mr surveyor
12-06-2013, 06:38 PM
I hate this for the good people of Connecticut.

I hate the "one bad apple spoils the barrel" kind of person.

I hate hating so I try to find something good in everyone and everything. I hate it when I can't find anything good.


If you're referring to the deranged individual that went on a rampage as being the "one bad apple" that resulted in these idiotic "laws", I have to disagree. The bad apples are the stupid politicians and their constituents that blame the tool (gun, knife, pointy stick, etc) for the problem rather than the actual "one bad apple". The gun had nothing to do with the issue rather than a tool.

ltxi
12-07-2013, 07:11 PM
There are now quite a few States in which to not live if you care at all about gun rights. other than IL, all are coastal.

muggsy
12-08-2013, 08:34 AM
An assault weapon is any weapon used in an assault. Since none of the weapons that I currently own were ever used in an assault, I don't plan on registering them. If I lived in a State that required me to register my guns, I'd be sure to vote against any Governor who failed to uphold and defend my constitutional right to keep and bear arms without infringement and who was stupid enough to sign such a bill into law. In fact, I might be inclined to organize a million patriot march on the Capitol of said state.

JimC
12-08-2013, 09:38 AM
In 1991 NJ passed their version of an Assault Weapons ban which included registration.
Registration at the time was $50.00 per gun.
I had to register two rifles at the time or be in violation and that would not have worked being an LEO.
Registering did however allow owners to retain their standard capacity magazines for registered weapons.
The list of "accepted" weapons is lengthy but one weapon that did not make the list was the civilian version of the AK-47. They were NOT allowed as were others.
There were numerous attempts to fight the law off but the left won out.
There have been numerous attempts to get the law repealed without any success.
Once a law is on the books it is nearly impossible to get it off.
The RINO that NJ has for a Governor with do nothing to aid law abiding gun owners.

JimC
12-08-2013, 09:41 AM
muggsy,

While I appreciate your attempt to redefine the term assault weapon, you are a little of in your reasoning. :rolleyes:


In the United States, an assault weapon is most commonly defined as a semi-automatic firearm (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semi-automatic_firearm) possessing certain cosmetic, ergonomic, or construction features similar to those of military firearms. Semi-automatic firearms fire one bullet (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bullet) (round) each time the trigger (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trigger_(firearms)) is pulled; the spent cartridge (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartridge_(firearms)) case is ejected and another cartridge is loaded into the chamber (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chamber_(firearms)), without requiring the manual operation of a bolt handle (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolt_action), a lever (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lever-action), or a sliding handgrip (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pump-action). In this context an assault weapon is often defined as having a detachable magazine (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magazine_(firearms)), in conjunction with one, two, or more other features such as a pistol grip (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pistol_grip), a folding or collapsing stock (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stock_(firearms)), a flash suppressor (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash_suppressor), or a bayonet lug (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayonet_lug).[1] (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assault_weapon#cite_note-Philly-1) Most assault weapon definitions are limited to rifles (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rifle), but pistols (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pistol) or shotguns (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shotgun) may also fall under the definition(s) or be specified by name. Some lawmakers have attempted to place pump-action shotguns in this category.

VN Vet
12-08-2013, 10:00 AM
The people that I am hating are the Politicians that think one bad apple spoils the barrel.

Our President and Crew says: Please don't hate all Muslims because of the evil of a few bad Muslims. Well Ok then, I want them to apply that same reasoning to us gun owners.

I think we are all saying the same thing.