Warning: This is VERY CONTROVERSIAL

[kahrseye]

Watch the following video at your own risk... Draw your own conclusions.

Louisiana Gun (http://la-gun.com/videos/manning/) :w00t:

[wyntrout]

He got a bit repetitive and I didn't wait for all of the singing at the end, but he's right. he's certainly outspoken! It isn't only the white people who aren't going to take it anymore.
Wynn:D

[jlottmc]

I agree Wynn. I said that when the gas prices shot up like they did that it would bankrupt this great nation, now look at us. I think that there are a lot more calling for revolution, and that it will probably come to a head not too soon after these elections. I think right now the hope of a peaceful ousting come election time is the only reason things haven't become nasty yet. Hate to say it but it's coming folks.

[hsart]

IMO the SHTF moment will come due to an economic catastrophe either here or somewhere in the world which will cause such massive fear that the financial systems will collapse this time around.. ATM's for cash will no longer work, food distribution will cease, fighting for remaining food in supermarkets. Once the food supply runs out - I hear that it would take about 2 weeks, then you better have enough ammo to protect your property. Some gold coins and piece of land - some old time self sufficiency is sounding better and better.
A few years ago this would have been classified as paranoid, except now all admit that the day may come sooner than later. I'm thinking in the next 10 years.

[Bawanna]

IMO the SHTF moment will come due to an economic catastrophe either here or somewhere in the world which will cause such massive fear that the financial systems will collapse this time around.. ATM's for cash will no longer work, food distribution will cease, fighting for remaining food in supermarkets. Once the food supply runs out - I hear that it would take about 2 weeks, then you better have enough ammo to protect your property. Some gold coins and piece of land - some old time self sufficiency is sounding better and better.
A few years ago this would have been classified as paranoid, except now all admit that the day may come sooner than later. I'm thinking in the next 10 years.

What would be your prognosis if my dream comes true and every incumbent in the house and senate are voted out at their very next election? Is there hope?

[Bawanna]

To me the SHTF moment happened at the last inauguration. I gotta find something to share here. If I can do it.

[Bawanna]

Some people have the vocabulary to sum up things in a way you can understand them. This quote came from the Czech Republic. Someone over there has it figured out. We have a lot of work to do.



"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency .It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president."


Wish I could say something this smart once in awhile.

[hsart]

What would be your prognosis if my dream comes true and every incumbent in the house and senate are voted out at their very next election? Is there hope?
Not a cure unless there are massive structural changes not only in the Federal legislative branch but also in the influence peddling special interests who in some ways control Congress. All incumbents being voted out would probably cause mass confusion rather than a solution. Part of the problem and the solution lies in tax law changes, people's willingness to accept that our collective lifestyle needs a bit of downgrading, and big government needs to become a lot smaller. Not sure this is worth 2 cents, but my opinion.

[jlottmc]

I read that before, and I must say that's spot on. Recall, I asked about the fools that elected this one. Something else to consider was the fact that the dems actually said that voter fraud would not only be acceptable but encouraged if it looked like they had a chance to keep Kennedy's seat. These folks have been trying and succeeding at these kinds of activities for a long time. Think back to the 04 elections, they almost got away with it. This is also not to say that the other guys are any better, just that they don't take as much at one time, nor do they get caught as easily.

[O'Dell]

Some people have the vocabulary to sum up things in a way you can understand them. This quote came from the Czech Republic. Someone over there has it figured out. We have a lot of work to do.



"The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the Presidency .It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president. The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails America. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president."


Wish I could say something this smart once in awhile.

I sent that editorial to nearly everyone in my address book a month or two ago. It's odd that everyone else can see the problems, but CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, etc and most of the American people can't or won't.

The results in the 'Super Tuesday' primaries this week were not very encouraging since 87 out of 88 incumbents won nomination. We have the opportunity to kick out every congressman and 34 of the 100 senators on November 2nd, but will the the "confederacy of fools" mentioned in the article do so? Unfortunately, I don't think so. I believe that the best we can hope for is a slightly more balanced congress that will maybe reduce the idiotic laws and policies coming out of Washington now.

[jlottmc]

I doubt it seriously. We may very well be in trouble.

[O'Dell]

Not a cure unless there are massive structural changes not only in the Federal legislative branch but also in the influence peddling special interests who in some ways control Congress. All incumbents being voted out would probably cause mass confusion rather than a solution. Part of the problem and the solution lies in tax law changes, people's willingness to accept that our collective lifestyle needs a bit of downgrading, and big government needs to become a lot smaller. Not sure this is worth 2 cents, but my opinion.

You are right of course, but right now I would take mass confusion over what we have. It would be nice to nuke K Street and reduce the budget of congressmen and senators to hire staff, so they might have to actually read the bills they're voting on, but I don't see it happening. One advantage to having new people up there is that they won't have had time to learn how to game the system. Unfortunately, after seeing the result of Tuesday's primaries, I don't think that we, as a people, are smart or informed enough to pull it off.

[wyntrout]

Everybody wants to get rid of the incumbents... the other ones, not "ours". They've been bought as the Congressmen were bought by Obama to vote en mass for these terrible new laws. It's all about "what I can get out of the deal." Promises of stuff taken from the producers has long been the bribe to the "general public" who easily swaps OUR freedom for their "security" or promises of services and benefits funded by the money wrested by gunpoint from the "rich" and producers.
In a society with no "rich" entrepreneurs and their workers producing stuff, we'll run out of "stuff" and the government will have to ration whatever they can FORCE people to make... 1950's to late 80's in the USSR comes to mind. Where you stand in line all day for your government controlled and produced shoddy consumer goods... one item at a time, often the goods running out before you got your meager "allotment". You spend most of your time waiting for nonexistent stuff....
Spread the wealth until it is all gone, then what??
Wynn:(

[hsart]

Like the USSR, some day we may have the same Stalinist slogan... we pretend to work and they pretend to pay us. Our paper money slowly becoming worthless. The danger of falling into a socialist economic spiral is that the government has more control.

[Bawanna]

I think that's all part of the O's master plan except he's giving the power to the UN or anyone that wears a towel on their head and rubs their head on a rug to pray to some buddha bellied cult figure.

[kahrseye]

I agree that "firing" everyone isn't the answer. As I see it, the Federal gov is way too bloated. Especially under the current administration. Since the gov doesn't manufacture anything, it's only source of income is PEOPLE WHO MAKE MONEY. We the wage earners will be under severe attack. I've already heard of plans to enact a VAT(value added tax) similar to Canada. What we need are Patriots. People who are more concerned with the well being of our country instead of the power of their political party. We need to close and protect our borders. Get the illegals out and cut off the head of the welfare snake. Overturn this crazy and ridiculous Health care law. Discontinue any kind of benefits to future legislators when they've left office. It's not a career, it's public service. Do a couple terms because you feel you have or want to contribute to your country and then get out and let someone take their turn. Feel free to add anything I may have missed.

[wyntrout]

We shouldn't have professional politicians. The first thing they want to do is bribe their constituents to vote for them next time to keep them in office. The other thing is amassing power and their own little bureaucratic "empire", further bloating the federal government. It becomes all about power... and gaining more power and keeping that power.
One of the worst things was the Seventeenth Amendment (Amendment XVII) to the United States Constitution which established direct election of United States Senators by popular vote rather than the appointment of senators by the governor or legislature of states to represent the STATES. That started the real erosion of states' rights and ruined our founders' excellent plan... balancing representation of the People and the States.
Wynn

[cgo99]

I agree with most of the previous statements. One thing is for sure, we are going thru 7 miles of bad road with the people in power right now.
I say lets do our homework and get read of the incumbents and get some people that wants to do the right thing for this country regardless of party affiliation.

[Bawanna]

I'd suggest forming a common sense party to run against the others but I don't think we could find enough qualified common sense people to fill all the seats. And I know we wouldn't be popular with any that are'nt qualified so it would probably be like 14 against the world. Not good odds.
I think the first thing we need to do is censor the media so they can only print the truth about candidates, not what they want everyone to believe. We only know what we're told about most of these people so its hard to make a solid choice.
I'd suggest turning everything back 50 years or so and trying again but that's so totally un PC correct they'd probably burn me on a cross.
I can't help but think of a lady I know who refused to vote for George Bush because his eyes were too close together. People think this stuff and really so this stuff. She was gonna vote for Gore, guess his eyes were more correct. I'd suggest mandatory reasons for voting for who your voting for but the people who count the votes or feed the counting machines are usually jobless people with nothing else to do or care about. An IQ requirement is out, since they'd no doubt tweak the system or give handicap points for all the sub species. I'm banning myself.

[kahrseye]

If you want to have some fun.....google Larry Sinclair and see what he says about a sexual encounter with our fearless leader. Never heard about this until now. I guess I live a sheltered life.