gun papa
06-24-2014, 02:40 PM
We have a new Sportsmans Warehouse that finally has some selection over Wal Mart.
I had bought some Hornady Critical Defense ammo, and on Sunday, some Remington Ultimate Home Defense .380 to try out in the CW380.
It was not until I got home when I realized that the bullet weight was 102 gr.
In the 1990's I had some experience with different bullet weights in the 380acp. While the CZ83, a larger handgun in the caliber would feed and print good groups, with 100gr. bullets, the Walther PPKS, a smaller gun, while the ammo fed okay, the gun strained to group worth the damn .
I thought that the CW380 may have similar issues as it is an even smaller and lighter gun than the PPKS.
When I went to shoot the CW380 and the Remington Ultimate Home Defense 102gr. projectiles, was something entirely different, and possibly not conclusive, but probable.
I leaded 4 rounds into the magazine. The gun fed all 4 rounds, and at 15 yards the ammo grouped quite nice, about 2 in. or less. Here is where trouble comes into paradise.
There was about 30 or more granules of unburnt powder in the chamber and in the ejection port. Could it be that the short barrel cannot consume all of the powder from launching the heavier bullet? I fired no more of this ammo. Generally, I have a poor view of Remington ammo anyhow. Just par. Papa
I had bought some Hornady Critical Defense ammo, and on Sunday, some Remington Ultimate Home Defense .380 to try out in the CW380.
It was not until I got home when I realized that the bullet weight was 102 gr.
In the 1990's I had some experience with different bullet weights in the 380acp. While the CZ83, a larger handgun in the caliber would feed and print good groups, with 100gr. bullets, the Walther PPKS, a smaller gun, while the ammo fed okay, the gun strained to group worth the damn .
I thought that the CW380 may have similar issues as it is an even smaller and lighter gun than the PPKS.
When I went to shoot the CW380 and the Remington Ultimate Home Defense 102gr. projectiles, was something entirely different, and possibly not conclusive, but probable.
I leaded 4 rounds into the magazine. The gun fed all 4 rounds, and at 15 yards the ammo grouped quite nice, about 2 in. or less. Here is where trouble comes into paradise.
There was about 30 or more granules of unburnt powder in the chamber and in the ejection port. Could it be that the short barrel cannot consume all of the powder from launching the heavier bullet? I fired no more of this ammo. Generally, I have a poor view of Remington ammo anyhow. Just par. Papa