CJB
01-18-2016, 06:14 PM
There is so much hooey, so much hyperbole, so much crap... about this gun, its amazing.
Just picked up mine today, have not shot it yet, so... its a dry run review.
First of all, for the most part, it feels extremely solid. The poly they use is extremely firm. There is a certain heft, a certain feel of solidity, of quality even, in the American .45
Mine came bone dry. I mean BONE dry. Not a luby thing on it anywhere. It did have the "new Ruger smell" that only Ruger seems to have.
The dingus at the trigger, a la Glock, is shaped weirdly. It needs a more rounded profile at the front. Even though its spring is comparatively light, the shape makes it feel weird on my finger.
Trigger pull is very controllable. It has a small bit of free travel, then a gradual stack to a plateau, and a bit more, and it breaks. The plateau feels like its 5 to 6 pounds, and I don't have weights handy to check. It feels about the same as the single action release on the FNX-45. Its not bad really. Complaints about the huge reset. Its not bad either. Maybe if you got that certain grippy grip, and wanna rock the pistol as you let recoil semi bump fire it at just the right point that makes recovering from a shot automatically go into a perfect double tap... for any sort of normal condition, its fine. Certainly a BG would not feel emboldened knowing it was a Ruger pointed at his chest, rather than a Walther PPQ. Just sayin!
Folks online complained about the rear of the frame being squarish. It is. I don't envision the biting the knuckle sort of issue some shooters had, but then again, I looked at the "grip" some shooters had, and it was a more or less "competition" grip. I basically just hold the gun and shoot it. Time will tell.
Of the two grip sizes with the .45, both felt pretty nice, but, I like the smaller one better - so far.
Novak sights are ok, but they could use a bit more angle at the edges so they're not so squarish in back.
I had one problem, putting an empty mag into the gun, and the slide didn't lock back. I tried it a few times and I noticed that the slide stop could be pushed up a bit more into its notch, but after trying a few more times, it was working fine. I'll blame "new" on that.
The magazines are nicely finished, in a grey nickle teflon, and feel good. Are easy loaders too.
Overall "heft" of the gun, and size really, is pretty much the same as the huge FNX-45. The FNX uses a wider magazine, which is only a wee bit longer, and it gets 15 shots in there. Ruger's is slimmer, just a hair shorter, and holds 10 rounds. The front of the floor plate on the Ruger was really rough, on both mags.
Weight is 2 ounces shot of the FNX-45, but I'll be damned if it feels anything but the same weight. Just shy of two pounds.
Width, about the same, length about the same, and the bulbous mag base on the FNX makes it a little taller. The Ruger American is essentially the same size, but feels so much better because its more rounded (except maybe those square parts at the back of the frame.
The bad -
Ruger fails to mention in their instruction manual... that once you have the take down lever swung down, and the slide assembly is off the frame, don't touch that take down lever! If you inadvertently swing it back to normal position, its highly likely to fall out in the process. It took me a good 20 minutes of further disassembly to discover what part to push ever so gently, in order to get the lever back in its place. DON'T TOUCH THE F'n LEVER! <--- what the manual for the American .45 should say!
And my barrel came pre-peened! Dunno how many shots it had at the factory, but there's a decent amount of fore/aft slop in mine, and the front of the barrel hood is all mashed up, and has a nice ridge of metal stickin' up nice n' proud of the rest of the adjoining surface. I'll call Ruger on this tomorrow.
My serial number is in the 5300 range, so they've made a few of these, had 'em ready to ship no doubt, before the release date.
Just picked up mine today, have not shot it yet, so... its a dry run review.
First of all, for the most part, it feels extremely solid. The poly they use is extremely firm. There is a certain heft, a certain feel of solidity, of quality even, in the American .45
Mine came bone dry. I mean BONE dry. Not a luby thing on it anywhere. It did have the "new Ruger smell" that only Ruger seems to have.
The dingus at the trigger, a la Glock, is shaped weirdly. It needs a more rounded profile at the front. Even though its spring is comparatively light, the shape makes it feel weird on my finger.
Trigger pull is very controllable. It has a small bit of free travel, then a gradual stack to a plateau, and a bit more, and it breaks. The plateau feels like its 5 to 6 pounds, and I don't have weights handy to check. It feels about the same as the single action release on the FNX-45. Its not bad really. Complaints about the huge reset. Its not bad either. Maybe if you got that certain grippy grip, and wanna rock the pistol as you let recoil semi bump fire it at just the right point that makes recovering from a shot automatically go into a perfect double tap... for any sort of normal condition, its fine. Certainly a BG would not feel emboldened knowing it was a Ruger pointed at his chest, rather than a Walther PPQ. Just sayin!
Folks online complained about the rear of the frame being squarish. It is. I don't envision the biting the knuckle sort of issue some shooters had, but then again, I looked at the "grip" some shooters had, and it was a more or less "competition" grip. I basically just hold the gun and shoot it. Time will tell.
Of the two grip sizes with the .45, both felt pretty nice, but, I like the smaller one better - so far.
Novak sights are ok, but they could use a bit more angle at the edges so they're not so squarish in back.
I had one problem, putting an empty mag into the gun, and the slide didn't lock back. I tried it a few times and I noticed that the slide stop could be pushed up a bit more into its notch, but after trying a few more times, it was working fine. I'll blame "new" on that.
The magazines are nicely finished, in a grey nickle teflon, and feel good. Are easy loaders too.
Overall "heft" of the gun, and size really, is pretty much the same as the huge FNX-45. The FNX uses a wider magazine, which is only a wee bit longer, and it gets 15 shots in there. Ruger's is slimmer, just a hair shorter, and holds 10 rounds. The front of the floor plate on the Ruger was really rough, on both mags.
Weight is 2 ounces shot of the FNX-45, but I'll be damned if it feels anything but the same weight. Just shy of two pounds.
Width, about the same, length about the same, and the bulbous mag base on the FNX makes it a little taller. The Ruger American is essentially the same size, but feels so much better because its more rounded (except maybe those square parts at the back of the frame.
The bad -
Ruger fails to mention in their instruction manual... that once you have the take down lever swung down, and the slide assembly is off the frame, don't touch that take down lever! If you inadvertently swing it back to normal position, its highly likely to fall out in the process. It took me a good 20 minutes of further disassembly to discover what part to push ever so gently, in order to get the lever back in its place. DON'T TOUCH THE F'n LEVER! <--- what the manual for the American .45 should say!
And my barrel came pre-peened! Dunno how many shots it had at the factory, but there's a decent amount of fore/aft slop in mine, and the front of the barrel hood is all mashed up, and has a nice ridge of metal stickin' up nice n' proud of the rest of the adjoining surface. I'll call Ruger on this tomorrow.
My serial number is in the 5300 range, so they've made a few of these, had 'em ready to ship no doubt, before the release date.