View Full Version : Wanted A CM9 Bought a CW9. Thoughts?
I received an e-mail from Bud's saying that the CM9 was on sale for $259.00. I've always wanted to try a Kahr and the economy CM9 looked like a deal. Unfortunately, the CM9 is not available in my liberal state of Calif.
I instead went for the CW9 which is legal in Calif. It's slightly larger and is slightly heavier than the CM9 but it holds one more round and is still considered a compact pistol.
What's your thoughts on the CW9 over the CM9 other than it being slightly larger?
I think you'll like it. Congrats on your Kahr.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
joemsj51
07-22-2017, 09:17 AM
Neither one is considered a front pocket pistol. So the only difference is in how it presents itself in belt-carry.
The CW9 offers you a slightly longer grip and slightly longer barrel. Better grip means better accuracy and better accuracy runs right alongside a longer barrel.
Good choice of yours!
Neither one is considered a front pocket pistol.
I strongly disagree with this, and I'm very sure I'm not alone in that opinion. My CM9 hides easily in the front pocket of most pants and shorts I wear - including Wrangler jeans, and it does so almost every day.
Including right now - there's a CM9 in there....
http://www.kahrtalk.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=14839&stc=1
Armybrat
07-22-2017, 01:17 PM
I would prefer the CW9 for the extra round and better grip (for my hands).
But I would put the available steel base plate on the magazine for a more "flush" fit than that big plastic one that comes with it.
zredwire
07-22-2017, 01:37 PM
I strongly disagree with this, and I'm very sure I'm not alone in that opinion. My CM9 hides easily in the front pocket of most pants and shorts I wear - including Wrangler jeans, and it does so almost every day
I also think the CM9 can be a front pocket gun. In fact I think that is where it really shines. To me, if I am going to hang a gun on the belt I would certainly go with one a little larger than the CM9. CM9 is great for ankle, pocket carry as well as it can be carried on the waist (in other words very versatile). For a gun that is not going to be on the ankle or in the pocket, the CW9 is very nice. When compared to another popular concealed carry gun, the M&P Shield, the CW9 is a little smaller in every dimension and weight, yet it holds the same amount of rounds and has a 1/2 inch longer barrel. Very nice.
I would prefer the CW9 for the extra round and better grip (for my hands).
But I would put the available steel base plate on the magazine for a more "flush" fit than that big plastic one that comes with it.
I agree that in the pictures I've seen of the CW9, the base plate is kind of ugly. Where do you get the steel flush base plates?
gb6491
07-23-2017, 07:13 AM
I agree that in the pictures I've seen of the CW9, the base plate is kind of ugly. Where do you get the steel flush base plates?
http://www.kahr.com/magazines/2/magazines.aspx
http://www.kahr.com/magazines/3/magazines.aspx
b4uqzme
07-23-2017, 10:23 AM
What's your thoughts on the CW9 over the CM9 other than it being slightly larger?
^^^^ as noted, the CW9 is probably a little large for pocket carry while many find a CM9 about perfect (and some don't). But a CW9 really rocks IWB or OWB plus you get that extra round. Otherwise they function the same IMO.
Underdog
07-23-2017, 09:15 PM
Very happy with my CW9, it's the perfect size and weight. It's a very accurate pistol and once broken in, extremely reliable. I highly recommend it. The length and width are perfect for different carry options.
CPTKILLER
07-24-2017, 08:27 AM
Your money your choice. Now shoot and learn the pistol. ;)
http://www.kahr.com/magazines/2/magazines.aspx
http://www.kahr.com/magazines/3/magazines.aspx
As always Greg, thank you!
Does Lakeline sell these? Thanks.
Your money your choice. Now shoot and learn the pistol. ;)
Well, I've been shooting pistols for over 50 years but yes sir, I can't wait to shoot it! :D
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.